EN
Book a talk
The Book Intentional Index Talks ZUZA Community About Book a talk

From the book

How do I stop relying on ready-made answers and keep thinking for myself?

Notice the menu before you order. The New Top 10% argues that a ready-made answer is a menu someone else wrote: it feels like free choice while the options were set in advance. Ask who wrote the list, what is missing from it, and keep a daily moment with nothing answering for you.

Why ready-made answers are so comfortable

A ready-made answer saves effort, and most of the time that is a good thing. The trouble starts when it is the only thing in view. The book describes a modern morning in which everything is already arranged: the feed knows what to show, the app knows when the train comes, the playlist you made last night is waiting. It all feels tailor-made, and that feeling is exactly what makes it hard to question.

The book calls this a perfect default: it feels like your personal taste and your free choice, until you forget to ask one simple question. Who set the coordinates and the boundaries of this route?

The café menu

Move III uses a simple picture. You sit down in a café, open the menu and choose freely: latte or Americano, sandwich or salad. The choice looks completely yours. But the list, the limits and the defaults were set by someone else in advance. Whatever is not on the menu never comes up as an option, so you do not miss it. Even a menu tailored especially for you is still the café's menu.

The book does not say this is good or bad. It asks when and where it matters to you that your choice be truly yours. That is the question to carry into the next ready-made answer: what else was not on the list?

Someone always places the chair

The book gives a business example. When Jeff Bezos was CEO of Amazon, he put an empty chair in the meeting room for the customer. By placing it, the book says, he signaled to everyone that on the company's game board the customer is North and that everyone in the room is expected to navigate accordingly. Where we stand and which way we face were decided in advance by whoever thought to place the chair.

The lesson the book draws is that whoever chooses to design the space gains an edge over those held captive by hidden coordinates that others set. The same is true of the answers that reach you. Someone decided what to put in front of you first.

Organizations have menus too

Move III adds that organizational culture steers more than the uniform and the language. It sets the rules for judging reality: what counts as success and what counts as a problem. At first you can still sense it, but over time the organization's ways of thinking become part of us. The book calls this organizational socialization.

It is the same mechanism at a different scale. Before accepting "this is how we do it here" or "this is how it works", it is worth asking whether you are hearing a fact about the world or a menu someone wrote. That difference is what keeps you from becoming someone who simply goes with the flow.

Why we settle

Move III explains why we so rarely look past what is offered. Until a few years ago, managing choices meant weighing alternatives with care. Today, because of digital overload, the default carries decisive weight: we are too exhausted to look for alternatives, so we tend to settle for whatever is put in front of us.

That is a more forgiving explanation than "people got lazy". It says the environment has changed, and the effort of questioning now has to be protected on purpose.

How to keep your own thinking switched on

The book offers one concrete daily exercise, and the rest below is our application of its ideas.

  • Leave the phone outside the bathroom. This is the book's suggestion for Move III: it is the one place we go into alone. Make a space with no phone, and no book either. Be with yourself. The book calls this being your own Metator at least once a day.
  • Ask what is missing. Before accepting an answer, a ranking or a recommendation, ask what was not offered. This is our suggestion.
  • Form a first view before looking. Even a rough one. It gives you something to compare the ready-made answer against. Also ours.
  • Use a threshold. Move IX places a conscious choice at the doorway, in the narrow gap between outside and inside, where you shift into neutral for a moment and choose rather than letting the habit choose.

The Metator and the map

The book's central image comes from the Roman army, where a Metator walked ahead of the camp, read the terrain and laid out the grid in which thousands would settle. Today's algorithm, it says, works like a digital Metator: it redraws the coordinates of your reality in real time. If you only move by coordinates prepared for you, you become a user of maps that others designed.

There is no vacuum, the book says. The ground is always marked with some set of coordinates. If you do not set your own north, someone else will set the limits of what you do.

What this does not ask of you

It does not ask you to reject every recommendation or to distrust every answer. Move IX says that picking the algorithm's suggestions automatically is not necessarily bad in itself, and that even refusing everything is just another default. The goal is the moment of choice: sometimes you take what is offered, and you take it because you chose to.

If you want to read how the book builds this argument, the preface and the first two chapters of The New Top 10%, by Dr. Yaacov Tzori and Beeri Tzori, are free: read the first chapters.

This post draws on Moves III and IX of The New Top 10% (the free first chapters). Suggestions marked as ours are an application of the book's ideas, not quotes from it.

All writing עברית